ОЧЕРЕДНЫЕ НАПАДКИ НА ГОМЕОПАТИЮ В ТУМАННОМ АЛЬБИОНЕ И ПЕРВАЯ БРОШЮРА ВОЗ ПО ГОМЕОПАТИЧЕСКИМ ПРЕПАРАТАМ

Многие международные издания для гомеопатов, равно как и научные издания Великобритании, сообщили об очередных нападках конвенциональной медицины на гомеопатию в стране, где история и дух гомеопатии столь значимы.

На этот раз все запросы направлены в парламентские комиссии Туманного Альбиона.

Подлинный текст обращения Еврокомитета по гомеопатии таков:

 "In a report published 22 February 2010, the Science and Technology Committee of the United Kingdom House of Commons concludes that homeopathy is not efficacious (that is, it does not work beyond the placebo effect), that explanations for why homeopathy would work are scientifically implausible and that further clinical trials of homeopathy could not be justified. Furthermore, it concludes that the NHS should cease funding homeopathy and that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should no longer license homeopathic medicines. Remarkably, just 4 of the 14 members of the Science and Technology Committee voted on this report: 3 for, one against. One of its three signatories has stridently campaigned against homeopathy and continued to do so even in the period between the hearings and the publication of the report. The European Committee for Homeopathy finds the conclusions and recommendations of the Science and Technology Committee completely unfounded. The report is highly tendentious and fundamentally flawed, consistently misrepresenting the scientific evidence to the detriment of homeopathy and making unfounded and pejorative allegations against those who advocate or practise homeopathy. The report ignores large areas of evidence which were mentioned in written submissions and oral evidence such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials of homeopathy for specific conditions and groups of conditions, and systematic reviews of biological models of homeopathic responses. The evidence suggests that homeopathy is effective in a number of specific conditions, and there are a number of reproducible biological models of homeopathy".

 А в комментарии в известном издании (журнале "NewScientist") сказано, что в парламетском комитете очень негативно настроены против гомеопатии. Вот цитата: "In the UK, a parliamentary committee has concluded that homeopathic remedies work no better than placebos and should not be paid for by the taxpayer".

На эти и другие уже отреагировали многие профессиональные гомеопатические организации Европы и мира, в том числе и азиатского региона (именно туда гомеопатия пришла из Великобритании). Открытое письмо всем коллегам разослали Еврокомитет гомеопатии (ЕСН) и Международная медицинская гомеопатическая Лига (LMHI). Последовали и реакции.

Вот, например,  что написали по этому поводу индийские коллеги Гупта (Sanjay Gupta & Juhi Gupta):

Dear all,

 Science and Technology Committee Evidence Check into homeopathy in London has given its report AGAINST homeopathy and they have asked for a complete removal of homeopathy from NHS and from UK .. May I please ask you to spend 5 seconds to vote yes for homeopathy , on the links below. We as homeopaths get as many people as we can to vote.  http://www.gm.tv/polls/45561-homeopathy-effectiveness-online-poll.html