Î×ÅÐÅÄÍÛÅ ÍÀÏÀÄÊÈ ÍÀ ÃÎÌÅÎÏÀÒÈÞ Â ÒÓÌÀÍÍÎÌ ÀËÜÁÈÎÍÅ È ÏÅÐÂÀß ÁÐÎØÞÐÀ ÂÎÇ ÏÎ ÃÎÌÅÎÏÀÒÈ×ÅÑÊÈÌ ÏÐÅÏÀÐÀÒÀÌ
Ìíîãèå ìåæäóíàðîäíûå èçäàíèÿ äëÿ ãîìåîïàòîâ, ðàâíî êàê è íàó÷íûå èçäàíèÿ Âåëèêîáðèòàíèè, ñîîáùèëè îá î÷åðåäíûõ íàïàäêàõ êîíâåíöèîíàëüíîé ìåäèöèíû íà ãîìåîïàòèþ â ñòðàíå, ãäå èñòîðèÿ è äóõ ãîìåîïàòèè ñòîëü çíà÷èìû.
Íà ýòîò ðàç âñå çàïðîñû íàïðàâëåíû â ïàðëàìåíòñêèå êîìèññèè Òóìàííîãî Àëüáèîíà.
Ïîäëèííûé òåêñò îáðàùåíèÿ Åâðîêîìèòåòà ïî ãîìåîïàòèè òàêîâ:
"In a report published 22 February 2010, the Science and Technology Committee of the United Kingdom House of Commons concludes that homeopathy is not efficacious (that is, it does not work beyond the placebo effect), that explanations for why homeopathy would work are scientifically implausible and that further clinical trials of homeopathy could not be justified. Furthermore, it concludes that the NHS should cease funding homeopathy and that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should no longer license homeopathic medicines. Remarkably, just 4 of the 14 members of the Science and Technology Committee voted on this report: 3 for, one against. One of its three signatories has stridently campaigned against homeopathy and continued to do so even in the period between the hearings and the publication of the report. The European Committee for Homeopathy finds the conclusions and recommendations of the Science and Technology Committee completely unfounded. The report is highly tendentious and fundamentally flawed, consistently misrepresenting the scientific evidence to the detriment of homeopathy and making unfounded and pejorative allegations against those who advocate or practise homeopathy. The report ignores large areas of evidence which were mentioned in written submissions and oral evidence such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials of homeopathy for specific conditions and groups of conditions, and systematic reviews of biological models of homeopathic responses. The evidence suggests that homeopathy is effective in a number of specific conditions, and there are a number of reproducible biological models of homeopathy".
À â êîììåíòàðèè â èçâåñòíîì èçäàíèè (æóðíàëå "NewScientist") ñêàçàíî, ÷òî â ïàðëàìåòñêîì êîìèòåòå î÷åíü íåãàòèâíî íàñòðîåíû ïðîòèâ ãîìåîïàòèè. Âîò öèòàòà: "In the UK, a parliamentary committee has concluded that homeopathic remedies work no better than placebos and should not be paid for by the taxpayer".
Íà ýòè è äðóãèå óæå îòðåàãèðîâàëè ìíîãèå ïðîôåññèîíàëüíûå ãîìåîïàòè÷åñêèå îðãàíèçàöèè Åâðîïû è ìèðà, â òîì ÷èñëå è àçèàòñêîãî ðåãèîíà (èìåííî òóäà ãîìåîïàòèÿ ïðèøëà èç Âåëèêîáðèòàíèè). Îòêðûòîå ïèñüìî âñåì êîëëåãàì ðàçîñëàëè Åâðîêîìèòåò ãîìåîïàòèè (ÅÑÍ) è Ìåæäóíàðîäíàÿ ìåäèöèíñêàÿ ãîìåîïàòè÷åñêàÿ Ëèãà (LMHI). Ïîñëåäîâàëè è ðåàêöèè.
Âîò, íàïðèìåð, ÷òî íàïèñàëè ïî ýòîìó ïîâîäó èíäèéñêèå êîëëåãè Ãóïòà (Sanjay Gupta & Juhi Gupta):
Dear all,
Science and Technology Committee Evidence Check into homeopathy in London has given its report AGAINST homeopathy and they have asked for a complete removal of homeopathy from NHS and from UK .. May I please ask you to spend 5 seconds to vote yes for homeopathy , on the links below. We as homeopaths get as many people as we can to vote. http://www.gm.tv/polls/45561-homeopathy-effectiveness-online-poll.html
 òî æå âðåìÿ, Âñåìèðíîé Îãðàíèçàöèåé çäðàâîîõðàíåíèÿ (ÂÎÇ) â Èñïàíèè ÂÏÅÐÂÛÅ (ôåâðàëü 2010 ãîäà) èçäàí îôèöèàëüíûé äîêóìåíò ïî ãîìåîïàòè÷åñêîé ôàðìàöèè - áðîøþðà "Safety issues in the preparation of homeopathic medicines". Ýòî "ïåðâàÿ ëàñòî÷êà" âçàèìîäåéñòâèÿ WHO, ECH è LMHI.
